Central-axis spool holders are the best for reliability and low friction, however they have a couple of drawbacks compared to rim-roller types:
This design aims to offer a substantial bore diameter range, while adding barely more width than needed for the common 608 bearings.
608 Bearing (2x per spool bobbin)
Woodscrews Ø3.5 x 50 countersunk
Ø3.5 x 20 countersunk
Ø3.0 x 10 pan / button head (optional for fixing to drybox lid)
The Brackets incorporate print-in-place sliders and hinges. As with any such feature it's imperative that the XY offset compensation is set correctly. It's termed the “Horizontal Expansion” parameter in Cura. Even so, the newly-printed items may require attention to work free their mechanisms.
The small Clips and Bearing Axle are best printed on rafts. The Clips should also be printed on their side, for bending strength.
Refer to images.
Some of the bobbin parts are quite thin : please assemble with care, using minimum force necessary, applied close to the joint, and wiggling the components together.
On disassembly it may help to gently ease them apart using a long thin blade.
Inserting the self-tapping screws, go slowly with a manual screwdriver and grip the component close by.
The retraction pinion (if fitted) should turn freely, and it can be lubricated simply using a graphite pencil on the interfaces.
When changing spools and removing the bobbin, push the outermost bearing out of its bracket, by pressing through the hole, rather than pulling it out.
I got a good result from this design.
I'd say the brackets are the strong point of the design.
The bobbin does also work, but it's less robust. It's a bit awkward to change the spool and especially to adjust the diameter for a different spool type. So it's most suited for when you'll expect to keep the same spool dimensions on subsequent reels.
It should be possible to use a screw-type bobbin with my brackets. Some of these are compact and would likely work, with perhaps slight design tweaks.
As a starting point I'd suggest the following:
- Item 68223 by @bradm10000
- Item 139191 by @Foreverwinter.
These would both lack the retraction function, at least without making a substantial remix.
To shave a few mm off the width, should this be necessary, it may be possible to redesign for a slimmer bearing type. I stuck with 608 for now as it's ubiquitous in this kind of equipment.
If much extra width is required, to accomodate a pair of wide spools, then longer Rail variants could be made. But these would not fit within the usual Ikea365 10L box.
Conversely, if width isn't a constraint for many users, the side Disks could perhaps benefit from thickening somewhat.
The author marked this model as their own original creation.