Hey guys, can anyone please explain to me how do I use punch-hole to make holes in a clear A4 sheet? I am trying to understand through the diagram but little confused.
Hey guys, can anyone please explain to me how do I use punch-hole to make holes in a clear A4 sheet? I am trying to understand through the diagram but little confused.
Hi Salman, the drawings are pretty clear, the dimensions are in millimeters. If you have hard time understanding the drawings, it will be quite hard to explain remotely. Ideally you can draw the holes on piece of paper, following the drawing. Then punch the holes on that piece of paper and use it as a test. See if it fits on your headband. Do few trials till you get the spacing right. Send me a personal message if this is not helping enough and I will try to explain more.
Hey thanks for your reply. It will try following your suggestion. Many thanks
Hello, thanks for the design. The headband design looks very nice and clean. As you can see in the attached photos, i have some problems, can you help me to solve them please? I use PETG, cura and the ender 3. The 3d printed object doesn't break easily and it has a smooth surface but i am not sure how to fix these empty lines, especially in the back area where the rubber band will be attached. If you have the kindness to help me, i would be grateful. (edited)




Hi Manos, importunately I am not familiar with your setup. Is this an issue you are having only with this print or with other prints as well?
Thanks for answering, at first i changed back to my previous version of cura and it fixed most of my problems but the only issue that i have now is the part of the headband that we attach the rubber band. I think the problem is because it is thin wall but i am not sure how to solve this.

Hi Peter, having a big problem with stacks on my Ender 3 printer using Cura Slicer. A lot of it is coming out stringy and week after an overnight print. It’s fine doing one but when it’s a stack it strings a lot



If you are printing very well a single unit, but have issues with the stack, then it is just layer+nozzle+speed+temperature optimization. Can make you a custom stack, sending you message now...
Hi Peter,
we are printing the headbands with our Ultimaker S5 and 2X printers. Unfortunately the results are very unstable when printing stacks.
Single headbands are printing fine with 0.2 layer height and a 0.4 nozzle. 0.3 mm doesn't work very well.
Do you have a suggestion regarding the underlying problem?


Hi, the stacks are made for 0.3 mm layer. So if you are printing with 0.2 mm layer, you may have some issues. Can you switch to 0.3 layer or that is not possible? If 0.2 layer is your only option, then we need to redo the stack for you. Let me know.
Thanks for the information. I've redone a stack with 0.2 mm distance. It was quite simple in Cura. I'll let you know if how it worked.
Hi Peter
Thanks for your drawings. But can you redraw its for 1mm nozle? EU stacked version
thanks (edited)
There is an user "Dave" who is running 1 mm nozzle, we made special stack for him. Let me ask him to come and connect with you as I am not sure exactly what setup he is running this on.
thanks a lot)
Hi Peter, Thank for your great work. I already printed your model for about 400 pieces and distribute to many hospitals in Thailand but some time I still got an issue, could you please add more rides at the position in the picture?


Pattiya, the only reason did not put ridges in those two places is because everyone else was complaining only about the inner curve and on the outside perimeter no one had issues. So decided not to put anything as to help separation. Will add some tomorrow and send you a note when ready.
Just uploaded the 10 and 15 stacks. You will see it with "april_17" in the file name. Added 6 more ridges, see if solves your stringing. (edited)
Does anyone have any tips on how holes can be quickly punched into the transparent A4 sheets? The template can be used to mark where the holes go...but how are you all actually punching in the holes? The EU standard double punch has the holes 80mm apart. (edited)
Final Stacked files uploaded. These seems the best overall compromise for most users, giving overall the best results. These are meant for 0.3mm layer, Ø0.4 mm nozzle, and the gap between units is 0.3 mm with tiny 0.4mm wide mini-ridges to act like supports, easily separated after completion. The feedback so far was pretty good, but let me know if there are issues.
Hi, is it possible to get a stack up to the top of the prusa? With 15 piececes? so it would be possible to print 30(15+15 nested) in one batch.
I was hoping someone would ask to push it “to the top” 😎 Will make you one today!
Peter, can you redraw the support of the pins to be at least 0,8mm thick? I would like to print with a .8 Nozzle and save loads of time but the slicer won't slice the supports...
If you are going with 0,8 nozzle then what is your layer thickness? The 0,3 gap between layers might me too small for you. I can make you a stack with bigger gap.
I would try 0,2mm, 2 outer layers (which makes infill obsolete).
Anyone wants to try something new?
Uploaded s set of new 3MF files. Stacks of 2, 4, 6, 8. The files have the new small rods supporting the pins in front, it saves some serious minutes on big stacks!
And also the gap between units is 0.3 mm, but instead of ridges, we are going to use few tiny connecting rods, as to see if this is sufficient, and it if would help a lot with separation after printing.
The files have been opened with Slicer, set correctly with "Detect Thin Walls", set at 0.30 layer and save, so if you use them, the pins should appear and you should have no problem printing. Please let me know if you decided to test some, as if it works well we will make them the default files. Thank you! (edited)
I did a first test, that was harder to separate. But it was a new PETG... I will do some further tests.
Don't waste much time, perhaps try a Stack of 2 only, because I am getting some great feedback from using the small ridges and small connecting rods and so we may not need to go to this extend here and do full ridge. If you next test is also harder, then we go to what works great on "Brasil". Thank you for writing back!
Posted part of this in the “Brasil” thread, but perhaps we can do another experiment here quickly and then compare notes and see which one works best. But first, the story:
Today tried all sorts of gaps on the stacked versions, and absolutely nothing worked! The features in between units (in the gap) simply disappear when you slice! Rods, walls, bricks, whatever - all disappears. Tried several height, all the way to 1 mm gap, but it all disappears!
So I decided this is not a software issue, or CAD issue, but it has to be some setting somewhere. After trying them all (or at least most of them), the one that now seems too obvious but was checked off was “Detect Thin Walls”. I can’t believe it is off by default, but hey. So I am going to make a bet most people have no idea where the button is (or what it does) and so most who have issues with printing the stacks (by seeing empty layers) were simply having the button “off”.
NOTE: You have to switch to “expect” in the upper right corner for this feature to appear in the “Print Settings”!
Once you turn that feature “on”, even the tiniest walls and features appear after slicing! See the 4 pictures attached here.
You can see in two of the shots, the latest trial is with little “Ridges”, which are 0.3 x 0.3 mm. That was with all the “Brasil” stacks and perhaps people will try them. For these stacks here (Europa), made a continuous ridge, going all around with no interruption, so we try this and see which one works best - the interrupted or the continuous. Then we can make all the files the same across all models.
Uploaded are all the new 2, 4, 6, 8 Stacked files, please give them a try and see if you get this to work. I also saved the gcodes for all of them and uploaded them too, see if that could be helpful in case you are not getting them to slice as these pictures here. Let me know your thoughts, I hope this was really the issue and we are over it now.
Can’t put the pictures in the correct order, but look first into those with the menus, so you see the settings and then you see the effect on the model.




Hi Peter, at the stacked versions, between the second and the third one, there is no single layer that makes it easy to seperate. Every other one is perfekt. Maybe you can have a look at it. (edited)
The layers are exactly the same, I really think (as of today) this is all software issue, as in it is a setting differences. Did hours of tests on gaps and layers, entire features disappear, then reappear again here and there, and so at the end had to change a setting and it all came home. Writing a post about it in Brasil thread, will copy-paste here too in a bit....