
Experimental mount for two slide bearings for a Prusa Core One! This article uses a bearing mount that differs from the original part with Prusa linear bearings!
I accept no liability for any damage to persons or equipment that may occur during conversion. You act at your own risk!
I would like to point out once again that my primary concern was to reduce noise during printing. Existing problems with surface waviness at certain speeds have other causes.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
17.02.2026
Images from the first VFA test uploaded
Note added regarding the priority elimination of noise and not the waviness of the surface
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
15.02.2026
Version 1.00 uploaded
Project details uploaded
STEP, STL, 3MF and GCODE Files uploaded
Youtube Videos uploaded and linked
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Loud rattling, ringing, or metallic booming and annoying resonance noises during printing for a good two months have now prompted me to take remedial action.
In the English-language Prusa forum and on Reddit, there have been numerous attempts to eliminate this metallic noise. Among other things, there was a suggestion to use plain bearings.
The original Prusa linear bearings are pressed into a metal housing. To avoid having to remove and adapt them, I simply designed two simple mounts.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
I used two slide bearings that I purchased here:
https://www.roboter-bausatz.de/p/gleitlager-igus-drylin-rjmp-01-10-lm10uu-alternative

I use four M3 threaded inserts from Ruthex per mount.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________
The print file has been designed with a dimension of 19.05 mm. The bearing may have different dimensions when delivered.
It is important to note that inserting the plain bearings into the holders with force will result in sluggishness of the entire Y-axis.
The plain bearings must fit into the holders without force—only then will the bearings run smoothly from left to right on the round bar.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________
I tried to record the noise behavior before and after on video. On my printer, the resonance noise was loudest at print speeds between 70 and 80 mm/s.
The before video shows the noise at 75 mm/s. Unfortunately, I had to provoke it, but that's exactly how it sounded when it reached this critical pressure speed.
For comparison purposes, I modified a print file to move only the Y and X axes at a critical speed: Noise_Testing_0.4n_0.2mm_PETG_COREONE_58m
After printing and installing all four bearings for the slide bearings, the result was surprisingly good! No more annoying metallic noises during printing.
The difference with this change is now very clear, and I am glad to have finally brought about a positive improvement.
For comparison purposes, I modified a print file to move only the Y and X axes at a critical speed: Noise_Testing_0.4n_0.2mm_PETG_COREONE_58m
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yesterday (17.02.2026) , I conducted another VFA test with the two slide bearings.
I used PETG Black from Bambu Lab. I will have a glossy PETG available for testing again tomorrow. I believe it is still evident that the waves have not improved significantly.
As has already been mentioned on the prusa forum several times, the wave spacing is exactly the same as the tooth spacing of the GT2 pulley. Nice to see at the 30-degree test week.
My VFA test ranged from 50 to 150 mm/s in 10 mm/s increments.







The author marked this model as their own original creation.